Monday, 12th October 2015
Words to the improvised song I performed with 2 friends, taken from the Alan Watts biography:
"A year or so before he died he had a stroke which impaired the
peripheral vision of his left eye. When I saw him the day after, he
said, "Alan, I am afraid to tell this to most of my friends because they
will think that I am crazy. But I was quite sure I was going to die,
even that I was dead. It was astonishing! An apotheosis! I found myself
where I and everything were transformed into a warm, golden light, where
there were formless presences welcoming and assuring me, like angels.
How can I say it? All this was much more real than ordinary life, which
now seems like a dream, so that I can't be possibly afraid of death any
more. Can you understand that I knew for sure that this golden light,
this divinity that I became, is the real thing? That this world in which
you and I are talking is just a shadow? That we haven't anything to
worry about at all-ever? And my God, how can this have happened to me?
Alan, you know I am a scoundrel and a lecherous man. Tell me, what do
you think? Am I nuts? Was I hallucinated? If they wouldn't think I was
quite mad I would recommend everyone to have a stroke." Several
months later he went to La Paz in Baja California to spend the winter in
the sun. In January 1971 he took off for Mexico City, and before
leaving, treated a group of friends to drinks in the bar at the airport.
But when he got off at Mexico City, seven thousand feet above La Paz,
the change of altitude was too much. He dropped dead of a heart attack.
Six hundred people attended his funeral.
We mourned, not for him, but for ourselves that this radiance, this colossal joie de vivre,
had left us. The Gate Five community of the Sausalito waterfront has
been dreary ever since. The hippies have been replaced by "freaks", who
look like peasants from a depressed area of Hungary. Perhaps they are
not to be blamed, for the industrial system offers few jobs that any
self-respecting person wants to do, and the intelligent young are sick
to death of a way of life that wastes and squanders material for the
production of baubles and bombs. But consider that Yanko, too, had no
job and nothing to mention in the way of money. Nevertheless, he has
left waves. He did more than anyone else to release me from pomposity,
from submitting to false modesty, and from knuckling under to the
general fear of the colourful and all that it signifies.
To go
back. A year after Jano and I moved onto the boat, we and a group of
friends created the Society for Comparitive Philosophy to sponsor my own
work, and to use the spacious studio for seminars and for a library to
shelter my thousands of books. Over the years we also raised funds to
assist others working along the same lines, and brought in, to conduct
seminars, the Lama Anagarika Govinda, Charlotte Selver, Krishnamurti,
Douglas Harding, and the Lama Chogyam Trungpa. I have a mild ambition to
create something which will carry on, in some respects, where the
Bollingen Foundation left off, since most of the great foundations are
stuffy and unimaginative and do not support weird scholars investigating
Amerindian mysticism or Tibeten iconography. But this may well change,
for the new decade is seeing a remarkable revival of interest and magic
witchcraft, alchemy, astrology, mysticism and mythology which is
invading even the universities and creating the suspicion that the
worldview of modern science may itself have been a peculiar form of
myth. Science itself, by investigating alpha-waves, anti-matter, holes
in space, psychopharmacologym and the dynamics or waves and cycles, may
be hoisted by its own petard to the confrontation of a universe very
different from what we now imagine, and its pandits may say with the Los
Angeles entomologist first hearing of von Fritsch's discovery of bee
language, "I have the most passionate reluctance in accepting this
evidence." For it does indeed seem that many scientists have a religious
fervor and a vested interest that nature is only a rather
inefficient machine-to which they must paradoxically ascribe their own
boastedly superior intelligences. My own interest, however, remains with
the mystical rather than the occult, for having seen what we have done
with ordinary technology I am troubled by what black magic we might
commit with psychotechnology.
I have said, however, that my
ambition for creating a philosophical foundation is mild, for it has
become by strong impression that human institutions and collectivities,
as distinct from individual people, are impervious to grace. This is no
more than a tentative opinion, but I feel that nations, churches,
political parties, classes, and formal associations of all kinds operate
at the lowest level of intelligence and moral sensibility. This is, in
part, because they are not organised as an individual is organised. They
act upon rules and verbal communications which, when compared with the
organic nervous system, are of extreme crudity. It is this which gives
us the feeling that most social problems are too complicated, for, in
the same way, the human body would seem too complicated were it not that
the nervous system-as distinct from conscious attention and memory-can
handle an immense number of variables at the same time. Societies,
insofar as they are restricted to linear, strung out, forms of
communication, can handle very few variables. Therefore governments and
corporations, in attempting to keep up with the infinitely varied and
multidimensional process of nature, resort to words on paper-to laws,
reports, and other records-which would take lifetimes for any
intelligent being to read, much less assimilate. Yet for all these
mountains of paper covered in small print, only a tiny amount of natural
process has been described, and we do not really know whether what we
select for description are actually the most important features of the
process. In other words, our social organisations are not organic.
As
they become more complex and computerised they become less organic,
because their code of communication-however fast and complex-rests on a
basic confusion of symbol with reality, of words and numbers with
natural events. When natural process is respresented in words, it
appears that there are separable things and events which may be dealt
with individually, one by one. There are not. In nature each event
implies, or "goeswith," all other events in varying degrees of
relevance, and we have only the sketchiest notions of how those degrees
may be measured-for how often do the most momentous events arise from
the most trivial? A chance meeting precipitates a marriage, and an
accident in a laboratory touches off a major scientific discovery. I
feel, therefore, that we have long been involved in an unworkable and
destructive method of managing both the social order and the natural
environment, and that our main hope of finding something better will be
through study of the nervous system itself-and by some other way than
representing it as a mechanical process. Until we find some such
alternative (and I may be saying that we must learn to develop our
intuitive rather than our intellectual faculties) I have little hope for
constructive, large scale social changes. Society will remain a swamp
redeemed only by some relatively few individual plants of fruitful
beauty.
Yet it is not difficult for me to be in a state of
consciousness where all such problems dissolve. I see that nature makes
no real errors; that man and his institutions are as natural as anything
else; and, furthermore, that my complaints about any situation are as
natural as the idea that I have no reason to complain. Of course this
curiously exhilarating feeling implies no specific course of action, and
may therefore be dismissed as worthless philosophy, a set of general
principles of laws, which does provide adequate rules for action,
without first having to be modified into chaos with exceptions. And the
sharper one's intellect, the faster one finds reason to take exception
to any general principle. Thus we begin the study of Greek in school by
learning the conjugation of regular verbs, only to discover that the
verbs most common used were irregular. As a language becomes rich with
usage and idiom it strays from grammar, or rather from description by
grammarians, and must be learned by ear. So, too, life must be played by
ear-which is only to say that we must trust, not symbolic rules or
linear principles, but our brains or natures. Yet this must bring one
back to the faith that nature makes no mistake. In such a universe a
decision which results in one's own death is not a mistake: it is simply
a way of dying at the right moment.
But nothing can be right in a
universe where nothing can be wrong, and every perception is an
awareness of contrast, of a right/wrong, is/isn't, bright/dark,
hard/soft situation. If this is the very nature of awareness, any and
every circumstance, however fortunate, will have to be experienced as a
good/bad or plus/minus in order to be experienced at all. By such
reflections I think myself into silence and, by writing, help others
similarly spellbound by thoughts and words come to silence-which is the
realisation that a linear code cannot justly represent a nonlinear
world. But this intellectual silence is not failure, defeat, or suicide.
It is a return to that naked awareness, that vision unclouded by
commentary, which we enjoyed as babies in the days when we saw no
difference between knower and known, deed and happening. This time,
however, we are babies reborn-babies who remember all the rules and
tricks of human games and can therefore communicate with other people as
if we were normal adults. We can also feel, as just-born baby cannot,
compassion for their confusions.
Now, from the standpoint of the
wise-baby the confusions of the normal adult world cannot be
straightened out without becoming even more confused. There is no
solution but to regain the baby's vision and so to realise that the
confusions are not really serious, but only the games whereby adults
pass the time and pretend to be important. Seen thus, the world becomes
immeasurable rich in colour and detail because we no longer ignore the
aspects of life which adults pass over and screen out in their haste
after serious matters. As in music, the point of life is its pattern at
every stage of its development, and in a world where there is neither
self nor other, the only identity is just This-which is all, which is
energy, which is God by no name"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A song I wrote when I was 16
A wooden box with flowers on is floating down a stream
A requiescat is being said but I cannot be seen
I only went to her flat 'cause she was my phenelzine
And the people were narcomaniacs
They didn't know me
Count up all my good deeds place white pebbles on the sand
The black stones represent the bad deeds that I've done to man
The robot lord of death judges me with his hand
But he don't own me, were narcomaniacs
We're so lonely, we're narcomaniacs
I shall take my imago to Shangri La with you
There we'll lay in almandines and swim in skies of blue
I wish i could speak to soothe you but i am scared too
And my invocations have not been answered i don't know what to do
My prayers to God have not been answered, fatalism lies with you
I would tear you open but I'm scared to look inside
I believe you're empty and that's the reason you have died
I wish i could talk to move you but my tongue is tied
And my thoughts are with the people you deserted and left behind
My thoughts are with the people you loved but left behind